+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs GPT-5 nano
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GPT-5 nano leads with 15.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 586.1K more tokens in context window than GPT-5 nano. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, GPT-5 nano is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-5 Nano was developed as the most compact variant in the GPT-5 family, designed for deployment in resource-constrained environments and edge computing scenarios. Built to bring next-generation AI capabilities to devices and applications where latency and efficiency are paramount, it distills GPT-5 innovations into a minimal footprint.
1 month newer
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
GPT-5 nano
OpenAI
2025-08-07
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.40($0.05 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:39.8%
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Average Score:55.0%(+15.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-5 nano
2024-05-30
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:39.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
GPT-5 nano
Avg Score:55.0%(+15.2%)
Providers:2