+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Grok-2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads with 7.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 978.1K more tokens in context window than Grok-2. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $11.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 2 was developed as the second generation of xAI's language model family, designed to provide enhanced reasoning, knowledge, and conversational abilities. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in xAI's model capabilities.
10 months newer
Grok-2
xAI
2024-08-13
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($11.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Input:$2.00
Output:$10.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:68.8%(+7.7%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Average Score:61.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:68.8%(+7.7%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-2
Avg Score:61.1%
Providers:1