+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Grok-3
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-3 leads with 28.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 978.1K more tokens in context window than Grok-3. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $17.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Grok-3 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 3 was introduced as xAI's third-generation flagship model, designed to push the boundaries of reasoning, factual accuracy, and helpful assistance. Built to advance the state of AI capabilities, it incorporates improvements across language understanding, generation, and analytical thinking.
4 months newer
Grok-3
xAI
2025-02-17
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($17.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:55.3%
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Average Score:83.8%(+28.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-3
2024-11-17
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:55.3%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-3
Avg Score:83.8%(+28.6%)
Providers:1