+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Grok-4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Grok-4 leads with 36.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 850.1K more tokens in context window than Grok-4. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $17.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Grok-4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 4 represents the fourth generation of xAI's language models, developed to continue advancing the frontier of AI reasoning and knowledge. Built to handle increasingly complex tasks with enhanced reliability, it demonstrates xAI's commitment to pushing AI capabilities forward.
22 days newer
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($17.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:38.3%
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Average Score:74.6%(+36.3%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Grok-4
2024-12-31
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:38.3%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Grok-4
Avg Score:74.6%(+36.3%)
Providers:2