Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads with 5.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 850.1K more tokens in context window than Grok-4. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $17.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FACTS Grounding (84.1%), Global-MMLU-Lite (81.1%), MMMU (72.9%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
xAI
Grok-4 is a multimodal language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.1% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (91.7%), HMMT25 (90.0%), GPQA (87.5%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
22 days newer
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Grok-4
xAI
2025-07-09
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Grok-4
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 16 common benchmarks
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Grok-4
Grok-4
2024-12-31
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Grok-4
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Grok-4
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Grok-4
xAI
ZeroEval