+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K2 0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 0905 leads with 11.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 589.8K more tokens in context window than Kimi K2 0905. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $2.60 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2 0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 was introduced as the second generation of Moonshot's language model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities across language understanding and generation. Built with architectural improvements and expanded training, it represents a significant advancement in Moonshot's model offerings.
2 months newer
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($2.60 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:64.6%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:75.8%(+11.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:64.6%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:75.8%(+11.2%)
Providers:2