+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 leads with 19.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct-0905 represents a specific release iteration of the K2 Instruct model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements. Built to provide enhanced instruction-following based on deployment feedback, it continues the evolution of Moonshot's instruction-tuned offerings.
2 months newer
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:36.2%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Average Score:55.9%(+19.7%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Coding31.6%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Coding65.8%(+34.2%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:36.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Avg Score:55.9%(+19.7%)
Providers:0