Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads with 34.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 852.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 8B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B was developed as an efficient open-source model, designed to bring capable instruction-following to applications with limited computational resources. Built with 8 billion parameters, it provides a lightweight option for developers seeking reliable performance without the overhead of larger models.
10 months newer

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2023-12-31
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together