Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct leads with 9.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FACTS Grounding (84.1%), Global-MMLU-Lite (81.1%), MMMU (72.9%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
8 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 24 common benchmarks
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct