Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads with 31.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
8 months newer

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra