Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads with 14.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
6 months newer

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together