+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Magistral Small 2506
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Magistral Small 2506 leads with 11.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Magistral Small 2506 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Small was created as an efficient reasoning-focused variant, designed to bring analytical capabilities to applications with tighter resource constraints. Built to balance problem-solving depth with practical deployment needs, it extends reasoning-enhanced AI to broader use cases.
7 days newer
Magistral Small 2506
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:49.4%
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Average Score:60.7%(+11.4%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Magistral Small 2506
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:49.4%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Magistral Small 2506
Avg Score:60.7%(+11.4%)
Providers:0