Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads with 20.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base represents an updated iteration of the 24B foundation model, developed with architectural refinements and improved training. Built to provide enhanced base capabilities for fine-tuning, it incorporates learnings from previous versions for better downstream performance.
3 months newer

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI