+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs o1-pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads with 26.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FACTS Grounding (84.1%), Global-MMLU-Lite (81.1%), MMMU (72.9%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-pro is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 82.5% across 2 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2024 (86.0%), GPQA (79.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
o1-pro
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:37.9%(+26.1%)
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Average Score:11.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o1-pro
2023-09-30
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:37.9%(+26.1%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
o1-pro
Avg Score:11.8%
Providers:0