+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads with 29.9% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Vision was developed as a multimodal variant of Phi-3.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend the Phi family's efficiency into vision-language tasks, it enables compact multimodal AI for practical applications.
9 months newer
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:72.9%(+29.9%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Average Score:43.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:72.9%(+29.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-vision-instruct
Avg Score:43.0%
Providers:0