+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Mini leads with 20.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FACTS Grounding (84.1%), Global-MMLU-Lite (81.1%), MMMU (72.9%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 17 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (88.6%), ARC-C (83.7%), BoolQ (81.2%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 29 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:18.3%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:38.3%(+20.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:18.3%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:38.3%(+20.0%)
Providers:0