Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads with 17.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Phi-4-multimodal-instruct. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
Microsoft
Phi-4 Multimodal was created to handle multiple input modalities including text, images, and potentially other formats. Built to extend Phi-4's efficiency into multimodal applications, it demonstrates that compact models can successfully integrate diverse information types.
4 months newer

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Microsoft
2025-02-01

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
2024-06-01
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Phi-4-multimodal-instruct
DeepInfra