+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Pixtral-12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads with 20.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 977.9K more tokens in context window than Pixtral-12B. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral 12B was introduced as Mistral's multimodal vision-language model, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built with 12 billion parameters for integrated visual and textual processing, it extends Mistral's capabilities into multimodal applications.
9 months newer
Pixtral-12B
Mistral AI
2024-09-17
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($0.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:72.9%(+20.4%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Average Score:52.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:72.9%(+20.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Pixtral-12B
Avg Score:52.5%
Providers:1