+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Pixtral Large
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite leads with 8.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Pixtral Large. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $7.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Pixtral Large was developed as a larger-scale multimodal model, designed to provide advanced vision-language understanding capabilities. Built to handle complex tasks requiring sophisticated analysis of visual and textual information, it represents Mistral's flagship offering for multimodal applications.
7 months newer
Pixtral Large
Mistral AI
2024-11-18
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($7.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Input:$2.00
Output:$6.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:72.9%(+8.9%)
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Average Score:64.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:72.9%(+8.9%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Pixtral Large
Avg Score:64.0%
Providers:1