+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 32B leads with 27.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 32B. Both models have similar pricing. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Qwen3 32B is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen3 32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
1 month newer
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($0.10 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:41.8%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:69.3%(+27.6%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:41.8%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:69.3%(+27.6%)
Providers:3