Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 25.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite offers 983.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite is $1.15 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
2 months newer

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita