+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite vs QwQ-32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
QwQ-32B leads with 15.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs. Overall, QwQ-32B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite was created as the most efficient option in the Gemini 2.5 family, designed to provide cutting-edge capabilities with minimal computational overhead. Built for applications where cost and latency are primary concerns, it extends advanced multimodal understanding to resource-conscious deployments.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ 32B was developed as a reasoning-focused model, designed to emphasize analytical thinking and problem-solving capabilities. Built with 32 billion parameters optimized for step-by-step reasoning, it demonstrates Qwen's exploration into models that prioritize deliberate analytical processing.
3 months newer
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-05
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-06-17
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Average Score:49.2%
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Average Score:64.3%(+15.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
QwQ-32B
2024-11-28
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
2025-01-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
1 providers
Throughput: 5.69 tok/s
Latency: 0.44ms
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash-Lite
Avg Score:49.2%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Avg Score:64.3%(+15.1%)
Providers:0