Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 23.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 852.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $2.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (88.4%), AIME 2024 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (85.3%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemma 3 27B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), IFEval (90.4%), MATH (89.0%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemma 3 27B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 36 common benchmarks
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemma 3 27B
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemma 3 27B
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemma 3 27B
Gemma 3 27B
DeepInfra
Novita