Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 45.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 1.1M more tokens in context window than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $57.20 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
Gemma 3N E4B IT was created as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E4B, designed to combine improved capability with edge optimization. Built for applications requiring both responsive instruction-following and edge-friendly efficiency, it serves as a stronger option for on-device AI assistants.
1 month newer

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2025-06-26
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
2024-06-01
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Together