Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 65.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 1.1M more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. GPT-3.5 Turbo is $0.80 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo was developed as an optimized version of GPT-3.5, designed to provide a balance of capability and efficiency for conversational and completion tasks. Built to serve as a cost-effective option for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it became widely adopted for chatbots, content generation, and general-purpose AI assistance.
2 years newer

GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash

GPT-3.5 Turbo
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash

GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Flash

GPT-3.5 Turbo

Gemini 2.5 Flash

GPT-3.5 Turbo
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Azure
OpenAI