Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 23.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 33.8K more tokens in context window than GPT-4.1 mini. GPT-4.1 mini is $0.80 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4.1, designed to provide strong capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to serve applications where speed and cost are priorities while maintaining solid performance, it extends the GPT-4.1 capabilities to resource-conscious deployments.
1 month newer

GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
2025-04-14

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash

GPT-4.1 mini
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash

GPT-4.1 mini
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Gemini 2.5 Flash

GPT-4.1 mini
GPT-4.1 mini
2024-05-31
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Flash

GPT-4.1 mini

Gemini 2.5 Flash

GPT-4.1 mini
GPT-4.1 mini
OpenAI
ZeroEval