+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs GPT-4.1 nano
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 33.8K more tokens in context window than GPT-4.1 nano. GPT-4.1 nano is $2.30 cheaper per million tokens. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (88.4%), AIME 2024 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (85.3%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano is a multimodal language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 25 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (80.1%), IFEval (74.5%), CharXiv-D (73.9%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input:$0.30
Output:$2.50
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.40($2.30 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 34 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:25.7%(+0.6%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Average Score:25.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:25.7%(+0.6%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Avg Score:25.1%
Providers:1