+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Grok-1.5
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 14.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Gemini 2.5 Flash is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (88.4%), AIME 2024 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (85.3%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok-1.5 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 63.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (90.0%), DocVQA (85.6%), MMLU (81.3%). Released in 2024, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Grok-1.5
xAI
2024-03-28
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:41.6%(+14.3%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5
Average Score:27.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:41.6%(+14.3%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5
Avg Score:27.4%
Providers:0