Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 57.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 848.1K more tokens in context window than Grok Code Fast 1. Grok Code Fast 1 is $1.10 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (88.4%), AIME 2024 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (85.3%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.8% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (70.8%). It supports a 266K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
2025-08-28
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Grok Code Fast 1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Grok Code Fast 1
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Grok Code Fast 1
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Grok Code Fast 1
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI