Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 52.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 852.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.1 8B Instruct. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is $2.74 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B was developed as an efficient open-source model, designed to bring capable instruction-following to applications with limited computational resources. Built with 8 billion parameters, it provides a lightweight option for developers seeking reliable performance without the overhead of larger models.
10 months newer

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2023-12-31
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together