+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 26.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Gemini 2.5 Flash is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B was created as a compact variant optimized by NVIDIA, designed to bring Llama 3.1 capabilities to more efficient deployments. Built with NVIDIA's efficiency optimizations, it serves applications requiring strong performance with reduced resource requirements.
2 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:77.4%(+26.8%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Average Score:50.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
2023-12-31
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:77.4%(+26.8%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Nano 8B V1
Avg Score:50.6%
Providers:0