Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 39.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is $2.70 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available on 6 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
Meta
Llama 3.2 11B was introduced as a mid-sized variant in the Llama 3.2 family, designed to offer enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency. Built to provide a balanced option for applications requiring more than lightweight models but less than flagship sizes, it serves diverse use cases in the open-source community.
7 months newer

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
2023-12-31
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Sambanova
Together