Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 50.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $2.77 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
7 months newer

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra