Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 27.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is $2.05 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available on 5 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
7 months newer

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Together