Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 32.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $2.40 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B was introduced with refinements to the Llama 3 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in instruction-following and task performance. Built to continue the evolution of Meta's 70B tier, it provides enhanced quality while maintaining the deployment characteristics valued by the open-source community.
5 months newer

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together