+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 7.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $2.40 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (88.4%), AIME 2024 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (85.3%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input:$0.30
Output:$2.50
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20($2.40 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:39.7%(+7.1%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:32.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:39.7%(+7.1%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:32.7%
Providers:9