+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 18.0% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 18.9M more tokens in context window than Gemini 2.5 Flash. Llama 4 Scout is $2.42 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
1 month newer
Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input:$0.30
Output:$2.50
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Input:$0.08
Output:$0.30($2.42 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:81.3%(+18.0%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Average Score:63.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:81.3%(+18.0%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Llama 4 Scout
Avg Score:63.3%
Providers:6