+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Magistral Medium
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 10.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium was introduced as a specialized model for advanced reasoning and analytical tasks, designed to handle complex problem-solving scenarios. Built to serve enterprise and professional applications requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Mistral's focus on high-quality analytical capabilities.
21 days newer
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:63.1%(+10.1%)
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:53.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:63.1%(+10.1%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:53.1%
Providers:0