Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 23.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Mistral Large 2. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $5.20 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (88.4%), AIME 2024 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (85.3%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2 is a language model developed by Mistral AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 87.6% across 5 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (93.0%), HumanEval (92.0%), MT-Bench (86.3%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Mistral Large 2
Mistral AI
2024-07-24
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Mistral Large 2
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Mistral Large 2
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Mistral Large 2
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Mistral Large 2
Mistral Large 2
Mistral AI