+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Mistral NeMo Instruct. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $2.50 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
10 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input:$0.30
Output:$2.50
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$0.15($2.50 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:2