Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 32.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is $2.40 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base represents an updated iteration of the 24B foundation model, developed with architectural refinements and improved training. Built to provide enhanced base capabilities for fine-tuning, it incorporates learnings from previous versions for better downstream performance.
2 months newer

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Flash

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI