+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 32.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is $2.40 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (88.4%), AIME 2024 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (85.3%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.9% across 5 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (81.0%), TriviaQA (80.5%), MMMU (59.3%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input:$0.30
Output:$2.50
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($2.40 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:51.4%(+32.9%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Average Score:18.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:51.4%(+32.9%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Avg Score:18.5%
Providers:1