Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 52.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Phi-3.5-mini-instruct. Phi-3.5-mini-instruct is $2.60 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 Mini was developed by Microsoft as a small language model designed to deliver impressive performance despite its compact size. Built with efficiency in mind, it demonstrates that capable language understanding and generation can be achieved with fewer parameters, making AI more accessible for edge and resource-constrained deployments.
9 months newer

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Flash

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Phi-3.5-mini-instruct
Azure