+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 25.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 1.1M more tokens in context window than Phi 4. Phi 4 is $2.59 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 was introduced as the fourth generation of Microsoft's small language model series, designed to push the boundaries of what compact models can achieve. Built with advanced training techniques and architectural improvements, it demonstrates continued progress in efficient, high-quality language models.
5 months newer
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input:$0.30
Output:$2.50
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.14($2.59 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:54.9%(+25.3%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:29.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4
2024-06-01
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:54.9%(+25.3%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:29.6%
Providers:1