+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 37.3% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Gemini 2.5 Flash is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 14B was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability and efficiency for diverse language tasks. Built with 14 billion parameters, it provides strong performance for applications requiring reliable instruction-following without the resource demands of larger models.
8 months newer
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:82.8%(+37.3%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Average Score:45.5%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:82.8%(+37.3%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Avg Score:45.5%
Providers:0