Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 46.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 974.8K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is $2.20 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 7B was created as an efficient instruction-tuned model, designed to provide capable performance with just 7 billion parameters. Built for applications requiring reliable language understanding with minimal computational overhead, it serves as an accessible entry point to the Qwen 2.5 family.
8 months newer

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Together