Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 9.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 235B A22B. Qwen3 235B A22B is $2.60 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Qwen3 235B A22B is available on 4 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B was developed as a large-scale model with 235 billion total parameters using a mixture-of-experts architecture activating 22 billion parameters. Built to provide frontier capabilities with computational efficiency through sparse activation, it represents Qwen's advancement into very large-scale model development.
21 days newer

Qwen3 235B A22B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen3 235B A22B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen3 235B A22B
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen3 235B A22B

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen3 235B A22B
Qwen3 235B A22B
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Novita
Together