+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Flash vs Qwen3 30B A3B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 15.2% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 30B A3B. Qwen3 30B A3B is $2.40 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (88.4%), AIME 2024 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (85.3%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 30B A3B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.3% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Arena Hard (91.0%), AIME 2024 (80.4%), LiveBench (74.3%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
21 days newer
Qwen3 30B A3B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input:$0.30
Output:$2.50
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($2.40 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:46.0%(+15.2%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Average Score:30.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:46.0%(+15.2%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 30B A3B
Avg Score:30.9%
Providers:3