Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking leads with 5.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 983.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is $1.15 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Gemini 2.5 Flash represents a continued evolution of Google's efficient multimodal models, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities while maintaining the performance characteristics valued in the Flash series. Built to serve high-throughput applications with improved quality, it advances the balance between speed and intelligence.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
3 months newer

Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Gemini 2.5 Flash
ZeroEval


Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Gemini 2.5 Flash

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Novita