+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Gemma 3 27B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3 27B leads with 23.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 offers 852.0K more tokens in context window than Gemma 3 27B. Gemma 3 27B is $10.95 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemma 3 27B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 68.8% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (89.2%), AIME 2025 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (87.8%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), IFEval (90.4%), MATH (89.0%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
Gemma 3 27B
2025-03-12
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
2025-06-05
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input:$1.25
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.20($10.95 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 34 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Average Score:26.3%
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Average Score:50.0%(+23.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Avg Score:26.3%
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 27B
Avg Score:50.0%(+23.7%)
Providers:2