+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 leads with 8.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 offers 858.1K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.3 70B Instruct. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is $10.85 cheaper per million tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 68.8% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (89.2%), AIME 2025 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (87.8%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.9% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (92.1%), MGSM (91.1%), HumanEval (88.4%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-12-06
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
2025-06-05
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Input:$1.25
Output:$10.00
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Input:$0.20
Output:$0.20($10.85 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Average Score:42.6%(+8.4%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Average Score:34.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Avg Score:42.6%(+8.4%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
Avg Score:34.2%
Providers:9