+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Gemma 3 1B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 leads with 58.5% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview was released as an early access version of Gemini 2.5 Pro, designed to allow developers and enterprises to experiment with next-generation capabilities before general availability. Built to gather feedback and demonstrate upcoming features, it provided a window into the evolution of Google's flagship model.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B was created as an ultra-lightweight open-source model, designed to enable AI capabilities on devices with limited resources. Built with just 1 billion parameters while maintaining instruction-following abilities, it serves edge computing, mobile applications, and scenarios where minimal footprint is essential.
2 months newer
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
2025-06-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Average Score:77.3%(+58.5%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:18.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Avg Score:77.3%(+58.5%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:18.8%
Providers:0