+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 vs Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 leads with 57.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview was released as an early access version of Gemini 2.5 Pro, designed to allow developers and enterprises to experiment with next-generation capabilities before general availability. Built to gather feedback and demonstrate upcoming features, it provided a window into the evolution of Google's flagship model.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E2B IT was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Gemma 3N E2B, designed to follow user instructions while maintaining edge-optimized efficiency. Built for applications requiring both compact size and reliable instruction-following, it extends conversational AI to resource-constrained environments.
21 days newer
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
2025-06-05
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Average Score:83.2%(+57.2%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Average Score:25.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
2024-06-01
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
1 providers
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Pro Preview 06-05
Avg Score:83.2%(+57.2%)
Providers:1
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E2B Instructed
Avg Score:25.9%
Providers:0